Final Exam Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 3

Final Exam - Assignment Exampleclaimed that in his reflections on self, he agnize that it was impossible for him to have a unified impression of self without the particular perceptions Hume argued that when he tries to think nearly the concept of self, what he stumbles upon are particular perceptions such as heat or cold, love or hate, or pleasure or pain. For this reason, on that pointfore, Hume concluded that there is no self, but what we call self is barely a bundle of sensationsIn his believe of the self, Immanuel Kant refuted Humes argument that we cannot have an idea of the self. In his epistemology, Immanuel Kant held that there are two sources of homosexual knowledge. i.e. sensibility and understanding. This estimate is contrary to Humes view Hume held that sensibility is the precisely source of benevolent knowledge. For Kant, sensibility gives us objects, while the understanding thinks and reasons about the given objects. In his epistemology, therefore, Kant was of the view that it is indeed possible for us to have knowledge of things which have no direct impressions. For Kant, therefore, by facial expression for the self I in sense impressions, Hume is looking for the self in the wrong place. For Kant, the self is the entity that unifies gentlemans gentleman experiences, thus enabling tender mind to synthesis sense perceptions.By saying that existence precedes essence, Sartre meant that human beings are the ones who make up, as it were, their essence. For Sartre, human beings are not determined, from the moment of their birth, what they will be in life. For this reason, therefore, Sartre viewed human beings as existing first before they determine what they will be in life. For Sartre, human beings are born with the freedom and the possibility to become whatever they want to become in life, i.e. human beings are born with the freedom and the ability to form their own essence. For Sartre, therefore, existence in human beings precedes essence. This view of human beings, however, makes human beings different from inanimate objects